Skip to main content

Flow cytometry analysis in your browser

FlowJo vs. Conspecta

A feature-by-feature comparison.

FlowJo is the desktop standard for flow cytometry, with deep gating, spectral unmixing, and an open plugin ecosystem, licensed per seat. Conspecta runs gating, compensation, t-SNE, and FlowSOM-style and PhenoGraph-style clustering in any browser, reads and writes both FlowJo 10 .wsp workspaces and ISAC Gating-ML 2.0, ties every FCS file to the sample it came from, and includes flow cytometry free for you and one collaborator.

How Conspecta compares to FlowJo
CapabilityConspectaFlowJo
Runs onAny browser, any device. Nothing to install.Windows and macOS desktop app.
PriceFlow cytometry is free for you and one collaborator. Academic teams pay a flat per-lab rate.Per-seat annual subscription. 30-day trial, no free tier.
Gate shapesRectangle, polygon, ellipse, quadrant, range, and boolean.Rectangle, polygon, freehand, ellipse, quadrant, curly quadrant, range, bisector, and boolean.
Reusing a gating strategyOne strategy applies to every file in the analysis. Save it as a template the whole project shares.Copy gates to a group so every sample in it takes them. Save a workspace as a template file.
CompensationFrom the file's spillover matrix, a CSV you import, or computed from single-stain controls. No spectral unmixing.From the file's matrix, edited by hand, or computed from single-stain controls, plus spectral unmixing.
Dimensionality reductionUMAP, t-SNE, PCA.t-SNE and opt-SNE built in. UMAP through the Plugin Exchange.
ClusteringSOM (FlowSOM-style), graph (PhenoGraph-style), K-means, DBSCAN.FlowSOM, PhenoGraph, and X-shift through the Plugin Exchange.
ReadsFCS 3.0, 3.1, and 3.2. Gating from FlowJo 10 .wsp and Gating-ML 2.0.FCS, LMD, CSV, and ACS, plus its own .wsp workspaces.
Export formatsGated populations as FCS 3.1. Gating as .wsp or Gating-ML 2.0. Statistics as Excel or CSV. Plots as PNG or SVG.Gated populations as FCS. Gating as .wsp. Statistics as CSV. Layouts as PDF, PNG, JPG, or PowerPoint.
Sample metadataEach file links to a sample record with condition, timepoint, and genotype.Keywords stored in the workspace, read from the file or typed in.
Cell cycle and proliferationCell cycle, proliferation, kinetics, QC time-gating, MFI comparison.Cell cycle, proliferation, kinetics.
Publication figuresFigure editor for multi-panel figures from live plots and charts.Layout editor for multi-plot layouts.
Who can open itEveryone on the project, in the browser, at the same time.One person at a time, by passing the .wsp file.

How the workflows differ

Why labs look for a FlowJo alternative

FlowJo has been the default flow cytometry analysis tool for decades, and for good reason. The friction usually isn't the analysis itself, it's everything around it. There's a per-seat license to renew, a desktop app to install and update on every machine as new versions ship, and analysis that lives in workspace files passed from one person to the next. For a lab that mostly needs to gate a few panels, compensate, and pull clean statistics, that overhead is the part worth shedding.

The same analysis, on any device

Conspecta moves the same everyday workflow into the browser. You open an FCS file, draw gates, apply a compensation matrix, and run t-SNE or SOM clustering without installing anything or holding a seat. Because it's a browser tool, the researcher on a Mac, the student on a Chromebook, and the PI reviewing on a tablet all open the same link and see the same analysis.

Flow data that stays connected to the rest of your work

The clearest difference isn't in the gating, it's in what happens after. FlowJo analyzes the FCS file in front of it and leaves the rest to you. The sample it came from, the timepoint, the genotype, and the figure it ends up in all live in other tools. In Conspecta, a gated population stays attached to the sample it was measured from, so its timepoint, condition, and genotype travel with it, and a figure you build pulls straight from that analysis.

In practice that means less of the manual bookkeeping that causes mistakes. You aren't exporting statistics into a spreadsheet, relabeling wells, and pasting plots into a separate figure tool, so there's less chance of a mislabeled condition or a figure built from a stale export. The flow work sits in the same project as the samples, images, and notebook it relates to.

What switching actually looks like

Moving over is mostly a one-time step. Upload your FCS files, then open your FlowJo 10 workspace with Import gating. Conspecta reads the `.wsp` in your browser, rebuilds the gating strategy, runs it over your own files, and shows its count beside FlowJo's for every population, so you can see how closely they agree before you keep anything. Populations it can't rebuild are listed and marked, never quietly dropped.

Rectangle, polygon, ellipse, quadrant, range, and boolean gates all come across. Ellipses are rebuilt exactly as the workspace states them, so FlowJo's own count can sit a fraction of a percent away, because FlowJo counts events through a slightly grown, screen-resolution copy of its own ellipse. Two things genuinely can't be rebuilt, and Conspecta names them rather than guessing: curly-quadrant gates, which have no equivalent outside FlowJo, and a gate on a marker a spectral instrument never stored, because the workspace derives it from the raw detector channels.

From there you save the strategy as a template the whole team gates from, rather than passing a workspace file around. It leaves the same way it arrived: results as FCS, Excel, or CSV, and the strategy itself as ISAC Gating-ML 2.0 or a FlowJo 10 .wsp, so a collaborator who stays on FlowJo opens your gating directly and nothing you do is locked into the tool.

FlowJo vs. Conspecta: the bottom line

Switch to Conspecta if

  • You want to gate, compensate, and cluster (FlowSOM-style SOM, PhenoGraph-style graph, t-SNE) in the browser with nothing to install
  • You want flow cytometry free for you and one collaborator, since FlowJo has no free tier
  • You want every FCS file tied to its sample, timepoint, and genotype
  • You build figures and want them made from the same flow data
  • Your team should share one gating template instead of emailing .wsp files, seeded from a workspace you already have and checked population by population against FlowJo's own numbers
  • You want a way back out: any strategy exports as a FlowJo 10 .wsp or ISAC Gating-ML 2.0, so collaborators still on FlowJo open your gating directly

Stay on FlowJo if

  • You unmix spectral data in your analysis software rather than on the instrument, since Conspecta reads unmixed files but cannot unmix raw detector channels itself
  • You rely on FlowJo's curly quadrant gates, whose boundaries bend to follow spectral spread instead of running along the axes
  • You need opt-SNE or a specific Plugin Exchange algorithm
  • Your workspace's plot layouts and page setup are the deliverable, since the gating comes across but plots, layouts, and colors do not

FlowJo and all other product names and trademarks on this page belong to their respective owners. Conspecta is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by them. This comparison is written by Conspecta, and we have tried to be fair, including where FlowJo does things we do not. Pricing, packaging, and feature details about FlowJo were last checked in July 2026 and may have changed since. Check their site for current details.

Try flow cytometry in your browser

Import your first FCS file and start gating in minutes. Free for you and one collaborator.