Skip to main content

One workspace for discovery, before the tool sprawl sets in

A preclinical team assembles its stack by accident: whatever the first three hires brought with them. Conspecta puts imaging, flow, molecular biology, samples, and figures in one project, priced for a team your size.

The discovery bench, without the IT project

One project. Every image, FCS file, construct, and figure stays linked to the sample and cell line behind it, and to the person who ran it.

  1. Notebook

    A notebook connected to the imaging, flow, samples, and figures in the same project, so the entry points at the data rather than describing it.

    How most labs do it today. Priced per seat, so it gets more expensive with every hire, and it covers the molecular biology while your imaging and flow data live somewhere else entirely.

  2. Imaging

    Cell detection, area, and intensity measurement in the browser on LIF, TIFF, and PNG, z-stacks included, with every result attached to the sample it was measured from.

    How most labs do it today. A desktop install per workstation, and an analysis saved on that machine rather than with the study, so re-running it later means finding the workstation it was set up on.

  3. Flow

    Gating, compensation, and clustering in the browser, with the strategy saved as a template the whole team runs.

    How most labs do it today. Another annual per-seat licence, and gating strategies passed around as workspace files rather than shared as a team standard.

  4. Samples

    Samples, cell lines, freezer locations, reagents, and orders tracked as research context rather than as a compliance record, with no procurement cycle to get started.

    How most labs do it today. The spreadsheet is load-bearing by month six. The LIMS is built for regulated QC, takes a procurement cycle to buy, and is far heavier than a discovery team needs.

  5. Sequences

    BLAST, CRISPR design, cloning, primer design, and alignment in the same project as the samples and analyses those constructs produced.

    How most labs do it today. The construct and the experiment that used it sit in different systems, so tracing a result back to the exact plasmid means matching names by hand across the two.

  6. Figures

    Figures assembled from the images, flow plots, and tables they came from, so the figure knows its own provenance.

    How most labs do it today. The slide that goes to the board is three tools removed from the raw data, and reproducing it a quarter later means finding the right export among many.

  7. Diligence

    Every result stays linked to the sample, the analysis, and the person who ran it, dated and attributable, which is what makes the underlying science reviewable.

    How most labs do it today. When a partner or an investor asks how a result was produced, the trail is a folder structure and a set of exports that have to be pieced back together.

Try it before the procurement call

Start free with your own data today, then add the team once the platform has earned it. Nothing to install, no pilot to schedule.